X
  • Home
  • About us
    • About CLOSER
      Our aim is to maximise the use, value and impact of UK’s longitudinal studies.
    • Our partners
      Find out more about our partner organisations.
    • Explore the studies
      Find out more about the longitudinal studies in CLOSER.
    • Our funders
      CLOSER is funded by the ESRC.
    • Who we are
      Meet the academics and professionals managing CLOSER.
    • Our Communities of Practice
      Find out more about our Communities of Practice.
  • Our studies
    • Explore the studies
      In this section you can find out more about the longitudinal studies that are part of CLOSER.
    • Timeline of studies
      View the interactive timeline of studies.
  • Search our data
    • How to access the data
      Learn how to access the data from the CLOSER studies
    • CLOSER Discovery
      Start using our search engine.
  • Research we fund
    • About the research we fund
      We fund interdisciplinary research across the major longitudinal studies.
    • Data harmonisation
      We are working to make the data from our studies more comparable.
    • Data linkage
      We are helping to link data from our studies to administrative records.
    • world icon
      CLOSER International
      Our CLOSER International project aims to promote the value of longitudinal studies in low and middle-income countries.
    • Other research we fund
      We fund other research in the biomedical and social sciences.
  • News & blogs
    • News
      The latest news from the home of longitudinal research.
    • speech bubble icon
      Blogs
      Opinion, analysis and discussion from the UK’s longitudinal studies community.
    • newsletter icon
      Newsletters
      Find out more about our newsletters and explore previous issues of Longitudinal News.
  • Events & training
    • Upcoming events & training
      See what events and training we have in the coming months.
    • Previous events
      Take a look at our previous events and associated resources.
    • CLOSER Learning Hub
      Find out about our online learning resource for those new to longitudinal studies.
  • Our resources
    • COVID-19 Longitudinal Research Hub
      Explore COVID-19 related activity including new surveys, data releases and findings from the longitudinal research community
    • Cross-study data guides
      Explore our interactive guides to discover measures used to assess cognition, physical activity, and diet in a number of UK longitudinal studies.
    • Our longitudinal resources
      Access our publications library and links to external resources.
    • Our longitudinal evidence
      Explore findings from our longitudinal studies.
    • Our changing society
      Information about the historical and political backdrop to cohort members’ lives.
    • Preparing for the future of longitudinal science
      Learn how CLOSER can help the UK’s longitudinal population studies meet the challenges facing them in the future.

Search
Menu

Home  >  Blogs  >  ONS releases new data standards

ONS releases new data standards

24 February 2020

Scoop.it ShareThis

Blog

Binary code, dataEarlier this month, ONS announced new data standards – a step towards more accurate data sharing across government. In this blog, CLOSER’s Technical Lead, Jon Johnson, explores why such standards matter and how they might be enforced.


It’s like that old saying goes, ‘You wait ages for a bus, and then two come along at once’. Two important developments recently occurred in the data standards world.

ONS Data Standards

The first ‘bus’ in this instance is the announcement by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) of its new data and metadata standards, fleshing out its Data Strategy, which is a significant step forward towards data sharing across government. ONS is a member of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe’s Modernisation of Statistics programme, which is attempting to coordinate the collection and dissemination of national statistics. Although it’s not been the most active member of the programme, ONS is clearing aligning with some of its outputs.

The schemas ONS is using are those adopted across Europe. While it might seem dull, using the same definitions for administrative fields is critical. It helps to ensure accurate and definitive data sharing between government departments and across borders.

The metadata standards proposed are Dublin Core for minimum exchange, Stat-DCAT for statistical microdata, SDMX for aggregate statistical data, CSVW for data description, and schema.org for definition of terms. These are internationally established and widely accepted both in government and, to a lesser extent, research.

The standards pay some attention to data formats (e.g. descriptions of currency or dates). But don’t dismiss this as a nerd thing. It takes major effort to avoid errors and misinterpretation of date and numeric formats, and currency. And such mistakes can also have real world consequences for individuals, businesses and the accurate exchange of data between systems. I fell victim to a similar error with HMRC when pre-populating my tax return without a decimal point. It meant it looked like I had a hefty tax bill but in reality they owed me money!

Carrot or stick? How do we ensure standards are widely adopted?

Then along came the second ‘bus’ in the form of a recent Administrative Data Research UK-hosted panel on the theme of ‘getting things done with data in government‘. Dr Stephen Lorimer, Head of Public Sector Data at the Department for Digital Culture, Media and Sport discussed key barriers to delivering standards. He said recent reports had poured cold water on the effectiveness of “winning hearts and minds”, advocating instead for a mandatory approach.

With either a carrot or stick approach, there is still need for skills training, accessible tools and coordination of technology. Government needs all of these if it wants ONS’s proposals widely adopted.

The consultation on the National Data Strategy can open discussions of where to draw the lines for acceptability and utility. Our experience in CLOSER has been that, while it is important to have incentives and exemplar models, coordinated progress will require a certain level of mandatory minimum standards to be enforced.


Jon Johnson is CLOSER’s Technical Lead. Follow him @spuddybike

  • Contact
  • Jobs
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
Back to top

CLOSER
UCL Social Research Institute
55-59 Gordon Square
London WC1H 0NU

map

TEL +44 (0)20 7612 6938 EMAIL closer@ucl.ac.uk

social media

Love longitudinal?

Sign up for our email newsletters to get the latest from CLOSER

Sign up
© 2018 CLOSER. All rights reserved.